US government wants to track your surfing habits.

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2006-05-20

This is an article from the San Francisco Chronicle online. I think it is a sad statement on our government, it's total lack of respect for the basic rights of each citizen. Dear God I hope we can vote most of them out of office soon.

"Internet firms are asked to keep search records
Justice Dept. tells executives it may need data to counter terrorism and child porn

Saul Hansell, Eric Lichtblau, New York Times

Friday, June 2, 2006

The Justice Department is "asking" Internet companies to keep records on the Web-surfing activities of their customers to aid law enforcement, and may propose legislation to force them to do so.

The director of the FBI, Robert Mueller, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales held a meeting in Washington last Friday at which they offered a general proposal on record-keeping to a group of senior executives from Internet companies, said Brian Roehrkasse, a spokesman for the department. The meeting included representatives from America Online, Microsoft, Google, Verizon and Comcast.

The attorney general has appointed a task force of department officials to explore the issue, and that group is holding another meeting with a broader group of Internet executives today, Roehrkasse said. The department also met Thursday with a group of privacy experts.

The Justice Department is not asking the Internet companies to give it data about users, but rather to retain information that could be subpoenaed through existing laws and procedures, Roehrkasse said.

While initial proposals were vague, executives from companies that attended the meeting said they gathered that the department is interested in records that would allow them to identify which individuals visited certain Web sites and possibly conducted searches using certain terms.

It also wants the Internet companies to retain records about whom their users exchange e-mail with, but not the contents of e-mail messages, the executives said. The executives spoke on the condition that they not be identified, because they did not want to offend the Justice Department.

The proposal and the initial meeting were first reported by CNet News.com and USA Today.

The department proposed that the records be retained for as long as two years. Most Internet companies discard such records after a few weeks or months. In its proposal, the department appears to be trying to determine whether Internet companies will voluntarily agree to keep certain information or if it will need to seek legislation to require them to do so.

The request comes as the government has been trying to extend its power to review electronic communications in several ways. The New York Times reported in December that the National Security Agency had gained access to phone and e-mail traffic with the cooperation of telecommunications companies, and USA Today reported last month that the agency had collected telephone calling records. The Justice Department has subpoenaed information on Internet search patterns -- but not the searches of individuals -- as it tries to defend a law intended to protect children from pornography.

In a speech in April, Gonzales said investigations into child pornography had been hampered because Internet companies had not always kept records that would help prosecutors identify people who traded in illegal images.

"The investigation and prosecution of child predators depends critically on the availability of evidence that is often in the hands of Internet service providers," Gonzales said in remarks at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in Alexandria, Va. "This evidence will be available for us to use only if the providers retain the records for a reasonable amount of time."

An executive of one Internet provider that was represented at the first meeting said Gonzales began the discussion by showing slides of child pornography from the Internet. But later, one participant asked Mueller why he was interested in the Internet records. The executive said Mueller's reply was: "We want this for terrorism."

At the meeting with privacy experts on Thursday, Justice Department officials focused on wanting to retain the records for use in child pornography and terrorism investigations. But they also talked of their value in investigating other crimes like intellectual property theft and fraud, said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington.

"It was clear that they would go beyond kiddie porn and terrorism and use it for general law enforcement," Rotenberg said.

Officials sought to assuage concerns that the retention of the records could compromise the privacy of Americans. But Rotenberg said he left the session with lingering concerns.

"This is a sharp departure from current practice," he said. "Data retention is an open-ended obligation to retain all information on all customers for all purposes, and from a traditional Fourth Amendment perspective, that really turns things upside down."

At today's meeting with executives of Internet access companies, Justice Department officials plan to go into more detail about what types of records they would like to see retained and for how long, said a Justice Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity. "It will be much more nuts-and-bolts discussions," he said, adding that the department would stop short of offering formal proposals."

-----

Thus with imagined wing our swift scene flies,
In motion of no less celerity
Than that of thought.



Blaze's picture
Posts: 1129
Joined: 2006-05-20

I read this in one of my RSS feeds today (I've added ACLU and EFF to my list recently).

I'm getting *very* sick of all this crap being put under the umbrella of stopping "child porn" and "terrorism".

I've always been one to try to look at things rationally. And for several years, I've argued against the people who've screamed "We're becoming a police state!" But It's getting to the point that I can't bring myself to disagree with them anymore. Bush and his appointees have over-stepped their authority too many times on too many fronts. When the entirety of Congress--both Democrat and Republican--are up in arms over the actions of the President and the Attorney General, you *know* that things are bad.

-----

Blaze
--------
A warrior is judged by his enemies,
A man by his friends.



Posts: 649
Joined: 2006-05-20
You're not the only one

You're not the only one Blaze. I'm having a serious issue with it too. The problem is we allow laws to be passed without ANY research or facts. This law has nothing to back it up. So it'll help child porn....sure....how? How many cases were there? How many of those needed ISP data? How many didn't have it because of retention issues? How many of those did the judge feel it necessary? Or the jury? Or anyone? You know that most computer logs are inadmissable in court.


-----

Posts: 1
Joined: 2008-07-23
porn has always and will

porn has always and will always be online it is the most searched then anything else i my self prefer getting london escorts then watching porn but i dont think ISPs should be involved in what their subscribers are viewing.


-----

Posts: 1
Joined: 2008-07-25
I think that more and more

I think that more and more people love to see lots of porn. Personal I prefer those lap dance clubs. They are more real.


-----

Posts: 3
Joined: 2008-12-16
Right to Privacy

I dont see a problem with the Givernment tracking user surfing habits especially if its to protect rather than pry. I mean if there are certain websites, like terrorist sites, or bomb making sites or child porn sites the government could keep a tab on the traffic that visits these sites becuase such people could be potential threats to the community however if they start prying on each and every internet user, which I doubt, then definitely i would have to agree. For now I dont think Porn viewers should really worry about anything. Personally with so many Escort Agencies and Female Escorts in the fray I think you can get a lot of vareity in the real world as well so porn may well be on its way out though I dont think anytime soon becuase the real deal is also quite expensive. Anyways I love porn too but I am not really worried.


-----

Posts: 3
Joined: 2008-12-16
The Real Deal Over Virtual Porn

Just to let you guys know, I was visiting london recently and some these London Escorts are quite cheap and they have them from all over the world, incase you may want to try.


-----