NSFW - body painting

Submitted by ambrosia on May 1, 2006 - 8:12pm

There are some really neat pics here. Some of them are unfortunately painted on very fake boobs, but regardless, it's neat how realistic some of the clothing he's painted looks (three pages altogether).

http://www.facepainting.net/Bodypainting.htm NSFW

‹ cam #2 Congrats Raven and ambrosia! ›

Comments

by dwild - May 1 2006 - 8:32pm

thanks ambrosia

& down with fake boobs!

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 5:38am

UP WITH FAKE BOOBS! BETTER OGLING THRU MODERN MEDICINE!

girls really NEED a C cup minimum

by TheCaretaker - May 2 2006 - 5:57am

scoops wrote:
girls really NEED a C cup minimum

That's "I prefer girls with at least a C cup", scoops...

I'm gonna eat you little fishie

by mcavic - May 2 2006 - 6:41am

In general, I think anything more than a B cup is unnecessary.

by Cuddlemonster - May 2 2006 - 8:56am

Cool paintings! I especially like the lingerie ones, they look so real.

*likes tits no matter what size, as long as they look good (ie: not grape-fruit fake)* :D Please refer to Robin Williams live on Broadway sketch. :lol:

Marg

I'm the cousin of this Geek called Steph...

~~ www.marula.ca ~~

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 10:07am

mcavic wrote:
In general, I think anything more than a B cup is unnecessary.

strictly speaking anything more than a nipple is unnecessary, but better living thru science means we don't gotta deal with small tittied women anymore..

we should create an international ENDOWMENT fund.. pun intended.

any woman needing to hit the C or better (and better should ALWAYS be encouraged) could get a grant to do so...

talk about beautification of our natural resources!

by Cuddlemonster - May 2 2006 - 10:18am

scoops wrote:
mcavic wrote:
In general, I think anything more than a B cup is unnecessary.

strictly speaking anything more than a nipple is unnecessary, but better living thru science means we don't gotta deal with small tittied women anymore..

we should create an international ENDOWMENT fund.. pun intended.

any woman needing to hit the C or better (and better should ALWAYS be encouraged) could get a grant to do so...

talk about beautification of our natural resources!


Um... are you aware that most women with more than a C cup are at high risk of developing serious back problems due to their *excess baggage*? Also, are you aware that having large breasts causes wearing a bra to become very uncomfortable, as it cuts into the top of the shoulders when supporting that kind of weight?

In the words of Mitch, it's like a weak midget trying to bring you down.

Marg

I'm the cousin of this Geek called Steph...

~~ www.marula.ca ~~

by ambrosia - May 2 2006 - 10:34am

I say we lobby for a national gender education fund. Any male who knows that little about the female body should be made to wear a boob harness with D-cup breasts for a month. Kind of like the prengancy sympathy harness, except...for boobs.

Oooh, and we could go a little further and make it a *period* harness. Make the boobs a little heavier and make the guys wear a wide elastic around their chest under the harness that stretches the skin and makes the muscles sore. And to complete the effect, make them wear very tight underwear that cuts in at the crotch and around their lower abdomen to simulate the cramps and pain.

Realistically, I think the world would be a better place if this came into being.

All that glitters has a high refractive index.

by mcavic - May 2 2006 - 10:35am

Ambrosia, you may be right.

Just for scoops:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Petra+Verkaik

by Moleculor - May 2 2006 - 10:38am

Cuddlemonster wrote:
Also, are you aware that having large breasts causes wearing a bra to become very uncomfortable, as it cuts into the top of the shoulders when supporting that kind of weight?

In the words of Mitch, it's like a weak midget trying to bring you down.

I've been told that a properly fitted bra by a professional (bra-fitter-person?) does not have this problem.

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 10:42am

guys wouldn't put up with that crap, we'd fix it.

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/exercises.php?Name=Hyperextensions+(Back+Extensions)

my gf in college was a ballet student from 2 years old. she had D cups but had the musculature to support them properly.

and she could cross her ankles behind her head.. AND in front...

yes... BOTH WAYS...

by erica057 - May 2 2006 - 10:43am

Moleculor wrote:
Cuddlemonster wrote:
Also, are you aware that having large breasts causes wearing a bra to become very uncomfortable, as it cuts into the top of the shoulders when supporting that kind of weight?

In the words of Mitch, it's like a weak midget trying to bring you down.

I've been told that a properly fitted bra by a professional (bra-fitter-person?) does not have this problem.

It's not so much the fit. Wide, padded straps do alleviate the problem.

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 10:44am

mcavic wrote:
Ambrosia, you may be right.

Just for scoops:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Petra+Verkaik

yummmmm Petra......

by erica057 - May 2 2006 - 10:47am

scoops wrote:

my gf in college was a ballet student from 2 years old. she had D cups but had the musculature to support them properly.

Posture helps a LOT more than musculature. But I will say that ballet probably helped her with that.

by ambrosia - May 2 2006 - 11:05am

Scoops: your statements sound dangerously like you believe that average-sized women aren't good enough and that if anyone bigger has size-related pain, it's their own fault that they don't fix it.

Of course, that can't *possibly* be what you actually meant, right?

All that glitters has a high refractive index.

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 11:06am

a good default posture is the result of a well balanced & developed musculature..

you spend your days maintaining good posture, those muscles get developed and it becomes natural for you.

that's part of the reason people "grow" an inch or two when they start lifting weights

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 11:08am

ambrosia wrote:
Scoops: your statements sound dangerously like you believe that average-sized women aren't good enough and that if anyone bigger has size-related pain, it's their own fault that they don't fix it.

Of course, that can't *possibly* be what you actually meant, right?

check your figures again... AVERAGE is now 36C.

by erica057 - May 2 2006 - 11:28am

scoops wrote:
a good default posture is the result of a well balanced & developed musculature..

you spend your days maintaining good posture, those muscles get developed and it becomes natural for you.

that's part of the reason people "grow" an inch or two when they start lifting weights


No, I definitely agree. I just wanted to point out the subtlety, but yes, the two go hand in hand.

I will say, though, that D isn't really that much of a physical burden. I'm a DD and it's really not bad. When you get into the E+ territory, a lot of girls have serious medical issues such as curvature of the spine that proper posture just won't fix.

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 11:31am

and there are of course exceptions...

humminahummina:
http://neuromancerwp.free.fr/Keira%20Knightley%2002%20-%201280.png
http://neuromancerwp.free.fr/Keira%20Knightley%2001.png

and this chick was in dance class with my ex:
http://philippe.lourdez.free.fr/wallpaper/images/girl/girl_liv_tyler001.jpg

both exceedingly good looking individuals despite lack of endowment.

by Haddock-Boy - May 2 2006 - 11:55am

I'm sure they'd appreciate the voice of support, too.

"hey, you're pretty hot for someone with sub-standard breasts. I still think that there should be governmentally-instituted funds and plans in order to help you improve your obviously deficient physical attributes, though."

Seriously, do you actually say crap like this in real life to real people, or is it simply an online anonymity thing? And in addition, does your strict policy on what everyone should want for their bodies extend to other things? Like people who have wrinkles should be governmentally aided in the cost for face lifts, or people with imperfect noses should have classes offered to let them know why rhinoplasty is an excellent option and make sure they understand they're not good enough as they are? I'd bring penis size into the discussion as a means of comparison, but there is a certain level of functionality involved in that, unlike breast size, which, although spectacular in every way, are mostly ornamental outside of the rearing of very young children.

I'm not even getting into the discussion about how posture and working out can alleviate breast-related back pain, because the comments that instigated it somehow escaped direct comment and ridicule, which they so richly deserve.

- HB

by erica057 - May 2 2006 - 12:09pm

Haddock-Boy wrote:

I'm not even getting into the discussion about how posture and working out can alleviate breast-related back pain, because the comments that instigated it somehow escaped direct comment and ridicule, which they so richly deserve.

Uh, it's not that ridiculous. If you go to a good doctor (read: one that is not just trying to take your money) and ask about breast reduction surgery, they will put you on a regime of crunches and posture-improving exercises to see if that corrects the problem. I am speaking from experience that if you're a D-ish they really can help.

Now, I also have a friend who is an F cup who has some serious medical issues due to her breasts and is in too much pain to even exercise. I think it's ludicrous to assume that exercise will work for everyone but it shouldn't be discarded as an option. Breast reduction surgery is highly invasive and all other options should be exhausted before taking that plunge.

by erica057 - May 2 2006 - 12:11pm

Oh, and I should add -- even when they're not big enough to be painful, they are still really, really, really annoying.

by ambrosia - May 2 2006 - 12:27pm

scoops wrote:
ambrosia wrote:
Scoops: your statements sound dangerously like you believe that average-sized women aren't good enough and that if anyone bigger has size-related pain, it's their own fault that they don't fix it.

Of course, that can't *possibly* be what you actually meant, right?

check your figures again... AVERAGE is now 36C.

I love this. "No, average sized women are fine. It's the people who are *less* than 36C that aren't good enough."

Great defence, there.

All that glitters has a high refractive index.

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 12:31pm

ambrosia wrote:

Great defence, there.

as good as is needed for the put-words-in-your-mouth offense...

by ambrosia - May 2 2006 - 12:35pm

Also...and I'm about to get into dangerous territory here so please forgive me if this comes out wrong...

I'm making the assmption here, scoops, that you're implying that women should all have large breasts *and nice, trim waists*.

Yes, there are a hell of a lot of women out there that are beautifully endowed and have absolutely wonderful figures (case in point - Erica), but my guess is that the reason the average cup size has gone up is because the national obesity average has gone up. Big boobs, yes, but the waistline kind of follows suit. My impression of you is that you would disapprove of such women and come up with an amendment to your earlier statement involving a maximum waistline circumference.

What say you to this?

All that glitters has a high refractive index.

by ambrosia - May 2 2006 - 12:40pm

scoops wrote:
ambrosia wrote:

Great defence, there.

as good as is needed for the put-words-in-your-mouth offense...

hmm...

scoops wrote:

girls really NEED a C cup minimum

scoops wrote:

better living thru science means we don't gotta deal with small tittied women anymore..

Yes. I can see how I'm totally putting words in your mouth.

All that glitters has a high refractive index.

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 12:44pm

i'd say i see a lot of morbidly obese women with flat flabby pancake breasts that would contradict your guess that fatter women automatically means bigger cup size.

it's a balance thing really, i really hate it when you get some woman with 10% bodyfat or less that gets a breastjob and you can see the skin wrinkle around the sides of the implants due to lack of fat. it's disgusting

so my statement earlier still stands alone regardless of waist size and i have no wish to complicate it.

by scoops - May 2 2006 - 12:46pm

ambrosia wrote:

Yes. I can see how I'm totally putting words in your mouth.

yes, it is apparent..

ambrosia wrote:
I'm making the assmption here, scoops, that you're implying that women should all have large breasts *and nice, trim waists*.

see?

by ambrosia - May 2 2006 - 12:54pm

scoops wrote:
ambrosia wrote:

Yes. I can see how I'm totally putting words in your mouth.

yes, it is apparent..

ambrosia wrote:
I'm making the assmption here, scoops, that you're implying that women should all have large breasts *and nice, trim waists*.

see?

Alright then, you seem to be saying that you prefer women to have C cups or higher -- no matter what body type -- over anyone with smaller breasts, even if the C,D,E,F cup in question is morbidly obese. If this isn't the case, I think you've left out some of your thought process.

ALSO, I'd like to point out that this is rapidly becoming an argument of semantics over preference when the entire concept that *started* this threadjack flamewar was that you said, and I quote,

scoops wrote:
girls really NEED a C cup minimum

If you had started out saying that you prefer large-breasted women rather than telling us science lets the world avoid dealing with small tittied women, I can guarantee you this argument would have been a short discussion about personal preferences over breast size, if that. Please keep it in mind.

All that glitters has a high refractive index.

by squidly - May 2 2006 - 1:07pm

women with large breast look best when dressed up . The dress hangs better, the curves , the cleavage but naked , women with smaller b or c breasts look the best. Science need to step up and develop breasts that can change size on demand.
==or small breasted women need to go around topless :)